November 2000

JEWELRY INSURANCE ISSUES (formerly IM News), provides monthly insight and information for jewelry insurance agents, underwriters and claims adjusters.

Subscribe to
Jewelry Insurance Issues

Table of Contents

Click on article titles in red

2008

GARNET and Its Many Incarnations - January

Organic Gems - February

Do your jewelry claim settlements make you look bad? - March

Don’t Be Duped by Fake JISO Appraisal - April

Diamonds in the Rough - May

The Cultured Club - June

Sapphire—Gem Superstar - July

It’s a Certified Diamond! 
— But who's saying so?
- August

FTC Decides: Culture Is In - September

Paraiba Tourmaline – What's in a Name? - October

2007

Moissanite's New Spin - January

Online Jewelry - Buying and Insuring - February

Blood Diamonds - March

Damaged Jewelry, Don't Assume!- April

Chocolate Pearls - May

Appraisal Puff-Up vs Useful Appraisal - June

It's Art, but it is Jewelry?
- July

Diamonds Wear Coats of Many Colors - August

DANGER!  eBay Jewelry "Bargains" - September

TV Shopping for Jewelry - October

Enhanced Emeralds - November

Rubies: Leaded or Unleaded? December

2006

The New Platinum: A Story of Alloys - January

Ruby Ruse - February

How Big are Diamonds Anyway? - March

GIA Diamond Scandal
Has Silver Lining for Insurers
- April

Watch Out for Big-Box Retailers Insurance Appraisals - May

Mixing It Up: Natural and Synthetic Diamonds Together - June

Tanzanite - Warning: Fragile - July

Red Diamomds - August

Inflated Valuations & Questionable Certificates - September

Emeralds - October

Where Do Real Diamonds Come From? - November

Counterfeit Watches — The Mushroom War - December

2005

The Lure of Colored Diamonds - January

Synthetic Colored Diamonds - February

Watches: What to Watch for - March

When is a Pear not a Pair? - April

The Truth About Topaz - May

White Gold: How White is White? - June

One of a Kind — or Not - July

Jewelry in Disguise - August

Valued Contract for Jewelry? Proceed with Caution! - September

Antiques, Replicas and All Their Cousins
October

Grading the Color of Colored Diamonds
November

New GIA Cut Grade for Diamonds - December

2004

Synthetic Diamonds — and Insuring Tips - January

Bogus Appraisals and Fraud - February

A Picture is Worth Thousands of Dollars - March

Don't be Duped by Fracture Filling - April

Gem Scams Point to Need for Change - May

What is a Good Appraisal - June

4Cs of Color Gemstones - July

Gem Laser Drilling: The Next Generation - August

Why Update an Appraisal? - September

When to Recommend an Appraisal Update or a Second Appraisal - October

Secrets of Sapphire - November

Will the Real Ruby Please Stand Up - December

2003

Mysterious Orient:
A Tale of Loss
- January

Bogus Diamond Certificates and Appraisals - February

Can Valuations be Trusted? - March

Spotting a Bogus Appraisal or Certificate - April

Counterfeit Diamond Certificates - May

Case of the Mysterious "Rare" Sapphires - June

Politically Correct Diamonds - July

Name Brand Diamonds - September

Princess Cut: Black Sheep of Diamonds - October

Reincarnate as a Diamond - November

Synthetic Diamonds - December

2002

Irradiated Mail/Irradiated Gems - January

Fake Diamonds (Moissonite) - February

GIA Diamond Report - March

AGS and Other Diamond Certificates - April

Colored Stone Certificates - May

Damaged Jewelry: Don't Pay for Nature's Mistakes - June

The Case of the "Self-Healing" Emerald - July

Mysterious Disappearance: Case of the Missing Opals - August

The Discount Mirage - September

What Can You Learn from Salvage? - October

Gaining from Partial Loss - November

Year in Review - December

2001

Colored Diamonds - January

Good as Gold - February

Disclose Gem Treatments - March

FTC Jewelry Guidelines - April

Myths Part I: Each Piece is Unique - May

Myths Part II: Myths, Lies, & Half-Truths - June

New Trend: Old Cut Stones - October

The Appraisal Process - November

Year in Review - December

2000

Deceptive Pricing - January

Gems - Natural or Manmade - February

Jeweler/Appraisal Credentials - March

Fracture Filling - April

Salvage Jewelery - May

Gem Treatments - June

Don't Ask/Don't Tell - A Buying Nightmare - July

Laser Drilling of Diamonds - August

Jeweler Ethics or the Lack Thereof - September

Gem Scam - October

The Truth about Clarity Grading - November

Year in Review - December

 

We'll be glad to notify you when the Jewelry Insurance Issues is available each month. Sign up for your FREE SUBSCRIPTION to Jewelry Insurance Issues.

Visit the rest of the JCRS site:  www.jcrs.com

Clarity Grading:
Will the real SI3 please stand up?

"I think the bourses are in the business of selling diamonds and, from a manufacturer's perspective, it certainly sounds better on the certificate to say the diamond is a slightly included 3 instead of an included 1."

Jerry R. Ehrenwald, president of the International Gemmological Institute

Clarity is the term used to describe the internal quality of a gem. Clarity grade is crucial to determining a gem's value.

A gemologist/appraiser examines a diamond for inclusions, cracks, spots, clouds, or any other blemish or imperfection of any sort. Other things being equal, the lower the clarity grade, the lower the value of the gem.

Fifty years ago, the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) adopted a clarity grading system now considered an industry standard. The GIA system recognizes 10 grading levels for clarity:

IF -- Internally Flawless
VVS1 -- Very Very Slightly imperfect (1)
VVS2 -- Very Very Slightly imperfect (2)
VS1 -- Very Slightly imperfect (1)
VS2 -- Very Slightly imperfect (2)
SI1 -- Slightly Imperfect (1)
SI2 -- Slightly Imperfect (2)
I1 -- Imperfect (1)
I2 -- Imperfect (2)
I3 -- Imperfect (3)

Recently, some gem suppliers have begun describing their diamonds as "SI3" —a grade that doesn't exist on the GIA system. They are trying to avoid classifying those diamonds as "imperfect" I1 gems. What difference does it make?

To a diamond grader, each grade level indicates specific things about the type, size and location of inclusions. But a major distinction exists between SI2 and I1. In diamonds of S2 grade or higher, inclusions are visible only under 10-power magnification; at I1 grade and lower, the inclusions are visible to the naked eye. By the traditional grading system, SI3 diamonds are simply I1. Diamond brokers, manufacturers and wholesalers note that there is a much greater pricing gap between SI2 and I1 than between any other two grades, so they see a merchandising need for an intervening grade. The European Gemological Laboratory has included the grade on its certificates since 1992, and the SI3 grade has recently been accepted by the World Federation of Diamond Bourses.

But diamond graders see the new SI3 grade as deceptive. As Ehrenwald points out in the opening quote, SI3 simply sounds better on the certificate.

The GIA, the American Gem Society (AGS) and the International Gemmological Institute (IGI) have no plans to adopt the SI3 grade. Retailers interviewed by National Jeweler magazine say that, even though suppliers may call something an SI3 grade, they will still sell it as I1 because it's less confusing that way.

FOR AGENTS & UNDERWRITING

The SI3 grade does not exist in the jewelry industry's standard grading systems. If you receive an appraisal that grades a diamond as SI3, be suspicious of the other descriptive information. The appraiser — perhaps the jeweler who sold the piece — may be trying to make the gem sound better than it is, or he may simply have accepted the supplier's clarity grade without examining the gem in his own lab. By all means use ACORD 18, Jewelry Appraisal and Claim Evaluation form, to determine whether the appraisal supplies the necessary information. If it does not, suggest that the policyholder get an appraisal by a Certified Insurance Appraiser™, who will examine the gems in his own lab and will use the industry standard grading system.

FOR CLAIMS

If you are settling a claim based on an appraisal that grades a diamond as SI3, be aware that this is the equivalent of I1. In communicating with jewelers about a replacement, it would be better to give the grade as I1, since this follows the industry standard.

CIA™ Corner

From Don Palmieri, CIA™

The SI3 grade was a good idea, but it's being applied in the wrong way. There is more lower-clarity diamond material being sold today than there used to be, and SI3 was originally proposed to the GIA to fill the large discrepancy between SI3 and I1. If the new grade were accepted, some gems would be upgraded from I1 to SI3 and some would be downgraded from SI2 to SI3.

However, only the GIA can alter its own grading system, and the GIA has not accepted the SI3 grade. Since the grade has not been defined, every use of SI3 is an abuse of the GIA system. If this grading system is a worldwide diamond standard, it must be used as it has been defined by the GIA.

Subscribe to Jewelry Insurance Isssues

For Insurance professionals: 8 hours CE credit. Jewelry insurance is the key to cross-selling opportunities to commercial insurance. Learn how to improve loss ratios and take advantage of value-add services for your agency.