June 2000

JEWELRY INSURANCE ISSUES (formerly IM News), provides monthly insight and information for jewelry insurance agents, underwriters and claims adjusters.

Subscribe to
Jewelry Insurance Issues

Table of Contents

Click on article titles in red

2008

GARNET and Its Many Incarnations - January

Organic Gems - February

Do your jewelry claim settlements make you look bad? - March

Don’t Be Duped by Fake JISO Appraisal - April

Diamonds in the Rough - May

The Cultured Club - June

Sapphire—Gem Superstar - July

It’s a Certified Diamond! 
— But who's saying so?
- August

2007

Moissanite's New Spin - January

Online Jewelry - Buying and Insuring - February

Blood Diamonds - March

Damaged Jewelry, Don't Assume!- April

Chocolate Pearls - May

Appraisal Puff-Up vs Useful Appraisal - June

It's Art, but it is Jewelry?
- July

Diamonds Wear Coats of Many Colors - August

DANGER!  eBay Jewelry "Bargains" - September

TV Shopping for Jewelry - October

Enhanced Emeralds - November

Rubies: Leaded or Unleaded? December

2006

The New Platinum: A Story of Alloys - January

Ruby Ruse - February

How Big are Diamonds Anyway? - March

GIA Diamond Scandal
Has Silver Lining for Insurers
- April

Watch Out for Big-Box Retailers Insurance Appraisals - May

Mixing It Up: Natural and Synthetic Diamonds Together - June

Tanzanite - Warning: Fragile - July

Red Diamomds - August

Inflated Valuations & Questionable Certificates - September

Emeralds - October

Where Do Real Diamonds Come From? - November

Counterfeit Watches — The Mushroom War - December

2005

The Lure of Colored Diamonds - January

Synthetic Colored Diamonds - February

Watches: What to Watch for - March

When is a Pear not a Pair? - April

The Truth About Topaz - May

White Gold: How White is White? - June

One of a Kind — or Not - July

Jewelry in Disguise - August

Valued Contract for Jewelry? Proceed with Caution! - September

Antiques, Replicas and All Their Cousins
October

Grading the Color of Colored Diamonds
November

New GIA Cut Grade for Diamonds - December

2004

Synthetic Diamonds — and Insuring Tips - January

Bogus Appraisals and Fraud - February

A Picture is Worth Thousands of Dollars - March

Don't be Duped by Fracture Filling - April

Gem Scams Point to Need for Change - May

What is a Good Appraisal - June

4Cs of Color Gemstones - July

Gem Laser Drilling: The Next Generation - August

Why Update an Appraisal? - September

When to Recommend an Appraisal Update or a Second Appraisal - October

Secrets of Sapphire - November

Will the Real Ruby Please Stand Up - December

2003

Mysterious Orient:
A Tale of Loss
- January

Bogus Diamond Certificates and Appraisals - February

Can Valuations be Trusted? - March

Spotting a Bogus Appraisal or Certificate - April

Counterfeit Diamond Certificates - May

Case of the Mysterious "Rare" Sapphires - June

Politically Correct Diamonds - July

Name Brand Diamonds - September

Princess Cut: Black Sheep of Diamonds - October

Reincarnate as a Diamond - November

Synthetic Diamonds - December

2002

Irradiated Mail/Irradiated Gems - January

Fake Diamonds (Moissonite) - February

GIA Diamond Report - March

AGS and Other Diamond Certificates - April

Colored Stone Certificates - May

Damaged Jewelry: Don't Pay for Nature's Mistakes - June

The Case of the "Self-Healing" Emerald - July

Mysterious Disappearance: Case of the Missing Opals - August

The Discount Mirage - September

What Can You Learn from Salvage? - October

Gaining from Partial Loss - November

Year in Review - December

2001

Colored Diamonds - January

Good as Gold - February

Disclose Gem Treatments - March

FTC Jewelry Guidelines - April

Myths Part I: Each Piece is Unique - May

Myths Part II: Myths, Lies, & Half-Truths - June

New Trend: Old Cut Stones - October

The Appraisal Process - November

Year in Review - December

2000

Deceptive Pricing - January

Gems - Natural or Manmade - February

Jeweler/Appraisal Credentials - March

Fracture Filling - April

Salvage Jewelery - May

Gem Treatments - June

Don't Ask/Don't Tell - A Buying Nightmare - July

Laser Drilling of Diamonds - August

Jeweler Ethics or the Lack Thereof - September

Gem Scam - October

The Truth about Clarity Grading - November

Year in Review - December

 

We'll be glad to notify you when the Jewelry Insurance Issues is available each month. Sign up for your FREE SUBSCRIPTION to Jewelry Insurance Issues.

Visit the rest of the JCRS site:  www.jcrs.com

Gem Treatments:
Enhancement or Scam?

Gem treatments are a staple in the jewelry industry. The treatments are called enhancements because they make lesser quality stones look better. If a gem looks better but costs less, that must be a good thing, mustn't it?

Gem treatments have been around for decades. Some treatments are so commonplace that certain stones almost always receive them. Such treatments improve the appearance of the gem and do not negatively affect the stone in any way. They are considered the normal way of handling that particular gem.

Other treatments are more limited and may not be stable. All traditional treatments, their purposes, and their effects, are listed in The Gemstone Enhancement Manual, a de facto standard endorsed by major jewelers' organizations.

In recent years a number of treatments have been developed that are much more controversial, even within the jewelry industry. One of these is the Yehuda clarity treatment, which involves injecting a colorless resin into a diamond to greatly improve its appearance. The treatment is not readily detectable and makes a diamond of lesser value appear to be of much higher quality.

One TV expose called Yehuda clarity treatment "a gem of a scam" because the stones were being sold without disclosure that they had been treated. The show's investigative team took a treated stone to four retailers for appraisal. Three of them did not identify the Yehuda treatment and appraised the diamond for much more that it was worth. If the treatment is not disclosed at the time of sale, not only does the customer pay more for the purchase, but the insurer pays more if the stone needs to be replaced.

The deception can also cause other problems. The Yehuda treatment has camouflaged a basic weakness in the stone. If the jewelry is subsequently cleaned or remounted, the heat involved in the procedure could destroy the Yehuda treatment. The stone would then appear to have become damaged (though it was actually just being returned to its original state) and the insurer could be responsible for replacing it.

FOR AGENTS & UNDERWRITING

The problem is not with the Yehuda treatment, which after all improves the appearance of the diamond, but with disclosure. Customers should be informed of the treatment and the treatment should be disclosed on the insurance appraisal.

Information about treatments can come only after inspection in a gem lab by a trained professional, such as a Certified Insurance Appraiser™. A jeweler without the proper equipment or training may leave out treatments because he has not detected them.

The ACORD 78/79 Appraisal form warrants that gem treatments are explicitly stated, unless the treatments are usually or always performed on a particular gem (according to the standards listed in the Gemstone Enhancement Manual). A gemstone that has been treated usually has a significantly lower valuation than an untreated stone of similar appearance. (By the same token, if a gem that usually undergoes a certain treatment has not had that treatment, then that lack of treatment should be on the appraisal. Such a stone would have a far higher valuation than one that had been treated to achieve the same appearance.)

FOR CLAIMS

Gem treatments expressly stated in the appraisal may significantly affect the value of a gemstone. This is part of the basic information necessary in pricing a replacement.

If a claim is made for damage, have the stone inspected by a CIA™ in a gem lab. Such inspection may reveal that the stone was originally flawed, and that the flaw was concealed with some temporary treatment. If a gem treatment breaks down — for example, under heat or impact — this is not damage. The flaw originally in the stone has merely become visible again.

CIA™ Corner

From Mary Frost, CIA™:

Working on diamonds with undisclosed treatments is a jeweler's nightmare. One customer brought in a ring to have the mounting repaired. We left the stone in place during the repair, which involves high heat. When we finished, the diamond looked like it had been through a war, all brown and nasty. Obviously a clarity treatment had broken down. We asked the customer why she hadn't told us it was a treated diamond, and she said she didn't know — the jeweler who sold it to her had not disclosed the treatment.

A treatment that involves laser-drilled holes that are filled is difficult to detect even under magnification. In the setting, the stone looks good. But when it is heated, the epoxy filler bubbles out. In this case, our store wound up having to pay to replace the diamond. This could have been avoided if the treatment had been disclosed — by the customer to us, by the jeweler who sold her the ring, by the vendor who sold the stone to the jeweler, and so on up the selling chain.

Mary Frost
Mr. T's Fine Jewelry
634 S. China Lake Blvd., Suite E
Sierra Lanes Plaza
Ridgecrest CA 93555
760.371-1458

Mr. T's Fine Jewelry sends mailings to its customers from time to time, educating them about jewelry and jewelry treatments. Mary Frost also says, "If you don't know jewelry, know your jeweler."

 

Subscribe to Jewelry Insurance Isssues

For Insurance professionals: 8 hours CE credit. Jewelry insurance is the key to cross-selling opportunities to commercial insurance. Learn how to improve loss ratios and take advantage of value-add services for your agency.